Category: Child Porn Witch Hunt

Child Pornographie, the modern witch hunt. Possession of any nude phontos of children or adolescents can ruin a person’s life with law suits and sex offender registration. Even if they are innocent family photos, photos installed by Trojans or viruses, or teenagers who photograph themselves nude.

HIgh school teen faces 10 years in prison for sexting female classmate

Teen sexting case highlights severity of N.C. sex offender laws

A North Carolina teenager faces felony sex crime charges after police discovered sexually explicit photographs of a sixteen-year-old girl on his cell phone. Cormega Copening is a seventeen-year-old high school student at Jack Britt High School. Copening was playing quarterback on the football team before being forced to sit out because of the felony investigation. The Fayetteville youth was arrested and charged with violating state law prohibiting the transfer of “sexually explicit” photographs of minors when police discovered nude photographs of Copening and his sixteen-year-old girlfriend on his phone. Police found the photographs by asking his mother, who pays the bill, if she would permit a search of the cell phone so the police might look for any possible evidence in a separate investigation of statutory rape.

Statutory rape means consensual sex with a minor, who is considered incapable of consenting, i.e. consent is invalidated. That also has difficulties as we show in

Copening was not a suspect in that investigation. During the search, the police discovered the nude photos of Copening and his then girlfriend.

It is sad, but it is safest NOT to cooperate with police. Innocent collaboration can point to some unexpected violation of the law.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “HIgh school teen faces 10 years in prison for sexting female classmate” »
HIgh school teen faces 10 years in prison for sexting female class…
» continues here »

16 year old Maryland girl produced child porn of herself

Why a 16-year-old Maryland girl shouldn’t be charged with child-porn distribution after making a video of herself. She did a sex act with a legal, “age appropriate” partner.

16 year old girl shouldn’t face child porn charges

 

Whenever a naked minor looks into the bath room mirror, s/he sees child porn.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “16 year old Maryland girl produced child porn of herself” »
16 year old Maryland girl produced child porn of herself
» continues here »

Hacked nude celebrity photos may be child pornography

 

Child Porn claims to scare sites into taking down photos

Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney claimed her nude photos are child porn, to scare web sites into removing her photos. 

Maroney’s lawyers confirmed that the leaked nude images of the U.S. gymnast were taken at the time when she was not yet 18. This means that the people who are involved in the leak and those who are storing copies of the images on their PCs could face a lawsuit on child abuse  Tech Times

But: Children photographing themselves are child porn producers

Little was McKayla Maroney aware she was incriminating herself of a heinous crime: "McKayla Maroney may be a victim of the leaked photo scandal, but she could be facing felony charges for child pornography." [2].  Any 17 or under "child" that takes photo of herself in any indecent pose, is a producer of child pornography (sexting). And mere possession of child pornography is punishable up to life in prison [3] [4] 

Child pornography can be fully dressed photos of 17 year olds

Deliberately posed pictures of children [up to 17 years of age] fully clothed, partially clothed or naked can be child pornography. If the dirty mind of a district attorney or policeman officer considers baby’s pose indecent, then Family pictures of nude baby bath can cause ruinous child porn prosecution.

Use a Polaroid, not the "cloud"

"Stars who want to take nude photos without getting hacked: Use a Polaroid: To keep private pictures private, never upload them online."[Fox News].

 

Will anyone question the stupidity of child pornography laws?

Only Human-Stupidity dares to ridicule voodoo theory, to  denounce child porn hysteria in 70 posts, to cite Milton Diamond‘s peer reviewed research and infamous Rind Study 

  

Virginia DA obtains warrant to forcibly erect child’s penis to photograph for sexting prosecution

A 17 year old "child" boy consensually exchanged intimate photos with his 15 year old girl friend. To bolster their case, the prosecution requested and obtained the right to photograph the boys genitalia in erect state, and to forcibly use medical means to obtain the erection.

Of course only the young man is prosecuted, even though the girl equally engaged in production, possession, and distribution of child pornography.

Teen sexting prosecution prompts outrage | BBC

On Wednesday the Washington Post reported on the case of a 17-year-old from Manassas, Virginia, who is facing felony charges for manufacturing and possessing child pornography after he allegedly texted nude images of himself to his 15-year-old girlfriend.

According to the boy’s defence attorney, Jessica Harbeson Foster, prosecutors in the Washington-area Prince William County want to bolster their case by taking photos of the suspect’s aroused penis and comparing it to the texted image using "special software".

She says the prosecutors have plans if the teen does not willingly comply.

"We just take him down to the hospital, give him a shot and then take the pictures that we need," Ms Foster says she was told.

She added that the police had already taken a photo of her client’s flaccid penis, obtained despite his objections.

So the prosecution already produced child pornography, forced a child to pose for indecent photos (Copine scale level 4: deliberately posed, not erotic)

Child porn laws purport to protect the child, even when 17 years old, from the repeated trauma of having his or her photo viewed (Voodoo theory).

    "Ugh, you fucking pervert. Sending pictures of your privates to a 15 year old innocent girl, you make me fucking sick. Now, I’m gonna pull down your pants by force, stick a needle in your dick, take a bunch of pictures of it, and then spend hours comparing them to the other pictures of teenage boy dicks I have."  7/09/14 11:36am  | View all 451 replies

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Virginia DA obtains warrant to forcibly erect child’s penis to photograph for sexting prosecution” »
Virginia DA obtains warrant to forcibly erect child’s penis …
» continues here »

Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia

Wikipedia has a quite frank discussion of child porn laws. Even Human-Stupidity is cited.  

We reprint the entire Wikipedia article here because we fear this will be repressed and edited out. Further down, after the reprint we point out where we would go much further then this Wikipedia article dares to tread.

Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main article: Laws regarding child pornography

While laws criminalizing child sexual abuse now exist in all countries of the world,[1][2] more diversity of views exists on questions like exactly how young those depicted in pornography should be allowed to be, whether the mere possession of child pornography should be a crime, or whether sentences for such possession should be modified.

Specific laws

In 1999, in the case of R. v. Sharpe, British Columbia’s highest court struck down a law against possessing child pornography as unconstitutional.[3] That opinion, issued by Justice Duncan Shaw, held, "There is no evidence that demonstrates a significant increase in the danger to children caused by pornography," and "A person who is prone to act on his fantasies will likely do so irrespective of the availability of pornography." [4]

Academic Milton Diamond has shown that availability of child pornography REDUCES child abuse, because pedophiles can act out their fantasies and possibly masturbate to fantasy child porn acts. His suggestion is, for this purpose, to create specific artificial child pornography under circumstances that does not traumatize children.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia” »
Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia
» continues here »

Nudist non-sexual child photos, legal in Germany: trouble for MP Sebastian Edathy and Merkel’s government

 

 Edathy pornography affair: The story so far

Among the ring’s customers was Edathy, who is said to have ordered material from the site between 2005 and 2010. The material consisted of pictures of naked boys assumed to be between nine and 14, in various poses, but not involved in sexual activity. The possession of such pictures is not illegal in Germany.

That is interesting. In Germany, possession of harmless photos of young children naked is not a crime yet. You can see such young children live on the innumerous nude beaches in Germany.

Human Stupidity has trouble understanding, or explaining to children, why photos of 100% legal acts, or cartoons of such acts, can be such a terrible crime. On the other hand, videos of terrorist beheadings, made exactly for the impact on the viewer and the publicity,  are legal.

The scientific truth is that accessible porn reduces rape and prostitution, countering the voodoo theory. Of course, the child sex trauma myth lobby can only ask for harder punishments

Germany’s Child Protection Agency demands that any commerce with pictures of naked children must be penalized. Justice Minister Heiko Maas also comes out in favor of stricter laws.

A huge international police inquiry because of a few photos of naked boys, which happens to be legal in Germany. Have we no other problems? Millions of obese and sedentary children have their health and future destroyed. The Euro crisis causes massive unemployment and might lead to civil war. And we care about a few nude photos?

Watch this video, one would never think that these were simple nude photos, no sexual activity or abuse.

Unfortunately, outside Germany we are not allowed to see or show the photos to understand what all the fuzz is about (Disclaimer)

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Nudist non-sexual child photos, legal in Germany: trouble for MP Sebastian Edathy and Merkel’s government” »
Nudist non-sexual child photos, legal in Germany: trouble for MP S…
» continues here »

Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison

Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it were not

 

Although a man who was 32 wasn’t breaking the law by having sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2008, he was by photographing the act, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

Marshall Hollins was convicted in Stephenson County of making child pornography and sentenced to 8 years in prison.

Is this not sad? It brings me to tears.

A good black man’s life destroyed, a girl’s boy friend taken away. All to protect her from "abuse". 

Where is Al Sharpton?

Where is President Barack Obama. I know, if he had a son, it would be a street fighting thug like Trayvon Martin. Where are men’s rights activists?

Where are the feminists, for the girl’s rights to have a boy friend, and to have her pictures taken?

 

He admitted he had sex with the girl when she was 17, which is the age of sexual consent in Illinois.

In a 5-2 ruling, the high court said that although the law allows 17-year-olds to consent to sex, they are still minors, making photos or video of such sex child porn.

This is nothing new:

The two dissenting justices said that because the photos don’t show an illegal act, they shouldn’t be illegal.

The dissenting minority has a bit of decency and common sense.

‘There was nothing unlawful about the production of the photographs taken by defendant in this case because the sexual conduct between defendant and (the girl) was entirely legal,’ wrote Justice Anne Burke, who was joined by Justice Charles Freeman.

‘The photographs are therefore not child pornography as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court for purposes of the First Amendment.

Due to voodoo theory and falsified research about the child sex trauma myth (Rind Study), the US supreme court made an EXCEPTION to constitutional rights of the First Amendment.

In the above case, no "*child" has been harmed through an illegal act, so there should be no reason to make an exception to constitutional first amendment rights.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison” »
Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was …
» continues here »

Child Pornography, Gun Dealings, on Trayvon Martin’s Cell Phone

Underage nude females constitute child porn. (Copine scale). Child pornography was found on Trayvon Martin’s cell phone, revealed whistle blower Ben Kruidbos, subsequently fired by special prosecutor Angela Currey.

Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos found on Trayvon’s cellphone, including pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semiautomatic pistol. Defense attorneys allege that data wasn’t turned over to them as part of the evidence exchange process, known as discovery. Orlando Sentinel

Possession of child pornography is a strict liability crime,  punishable with severe multi-year mandatory prison sentences for each single picture and life long registration as a sex offender.

According to legal doctrine the depicted minor suffers severe victimization whenever these photos are viewed.

Nelson declined on Thursday to rule, before trial anyway, on a defense request to sanction prosecutors for allegedly failing to disclose key text messages and photos found in Trayvon’s cell phone.

The new data included photos of naked “underage” girls, Trayvon smoking, a photo of a gun and texts describing what appeared to show the teen arranging the purchase of a firearm. The information was later released to the media by the defense but won’t be shown initially to jurors.
Miami Herald (see also Fox News)

This is all part of Government and media’s lies, deceit about George Zimmermann trial.

Trayvon Martin, a thuggish criminal with multiple 10 day school suspension for crimes that were never reported to police (possession of lumps of jewelry, burglary tools, drugs, multi round after school MMA fighting and aggression) and now, child pornography and semi-automatic weapon photos.

Kruidbos, who testified in a pretrial hearing in the Zimmerman case in June, said that he had reason to believe that additional information found in Trayvon Martin’s cell phone had not been turned over to the defense. Kruidbos said more than 2,000 photos from the phone were not shown to defense attorneys, including pictures of underage naked girls, images showing piles of jewelry on Martin’s bed and photos of Martin blowing smoke. HLNtv

One might dismiss naked underage girls as irrelevant. Human-Stupidity has amply documented, how prosecutors think naked underage girls are extremely relevant due to child pornography  laws.

 

But piles of jewelry raise suspicion that Trayvon really is a burglar, maybe was checking out houses and was correctly profiled by George Zimmerman.

Piles of jewelry (likely the proceeds of burglary) had been found in Trayvon Martin’s school backpack, confiscated, and were never part of a police inquiry, due to government orders to avoid disciplining black students.

After school MMA fighting, gun procurement activities etc. would complete the picture of an aggressor that would not just go home when angered by a suspicious neighborhood watch man, but would go back to exact revenge and blood.

 

Some of the earliest text messages date back to early November 2011, in which Trayvon, a junior at Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School in North Miami-Dade, indicates he was suspended from school for being in a fistfight.

Later in the month, on the 21st, he exchanged messages with at least one friend about an after-school fight.

One of Trayvon’s cellphone pictures shows two teens about to square off against one another as a third stands in the middle like a referee. Trayvon said he fought a rival who "snitched on me." I
n Trayvon Martin’s text messages, talk of marijuana, fights and guns

Little sweet Trayvon, a habitual street fighter, drug user, interested in guns. Inadmissible evidence?